Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7143 13
Original file (NR7143 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 100°
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490

 

DIC
Docket No. NR7143-43
210 Jun 14

 

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of 10 usc 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on

9 June 2014. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in
accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable
to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of your application, together with all material
submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable
statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered
the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memo 5730 N132 dtd 19 Mar 14, a
copy of which is attached.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record,
the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to
establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In
this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments
contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application, and
your request for a personal appearance before the Board have been
denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
furnished wpon request. ,

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken, You are entitled to have the Board
reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence
or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of
regularity attaches to all official records. Consequentiy, when
applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is
on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material
error or injustice.

/ Sincerely,
ete D ~~
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Acting Executive Director

Enclosure: CNO memo 5730 N132 dtd 19 Mar 14

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 04327-09

    Original file (04327-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 June 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memo 5730 N132 of 2 Jun 09, a copy of which is attached.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11913-08

    Original file (11913-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, . Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The petitioner is requesting to not be paid her $1,000.00 Enlistment Bonus Source Rate (EBSR} and the $5,000.00 Enlistment Bonus College Credit (EBCC) and cancel her 12 month agreement to extend.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04470-06

    Original file (04470-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by BNP memo 5730 Pers-4011 dtd 27 Dec 06, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 04512-12

    Original file (04512-12.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 05597-10

    Original file (05597-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a National Call to Service (NCS) bonus. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05699-08

    Original file (05699-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a $5,000'National Call to Service (NCS) Incentive bonus. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Exnicios, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 02938-07

    Original file (02938-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a National Call to Service (NCS) incentive bonus.2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Koman, Mr. Washington, and Ms. McCormick, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 20 November 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03950-07

    Original file (03950-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5 100MEHDocket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a National Call to Service (NCS) incentive bonus.2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Koman, Mr. Washington, and Ms. McCormick, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04908-07

    Original file (04908-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a National Call to Service (NCS) incentive bonus.2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Koman, Mr. Washington, and Ms. McCormick, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 20 November 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04803-07

    Original file (04803-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a National Call to Service (NCS) incentive bonus.2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Koman, Mr. Washington, and Ms. McCormick, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 20 November 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective...